The reason why the Lord’s Supper held such a significant place in the early church is because it embodies the major features of the Christian life. The emblems we see, the bread and the wine, at the Lord’s Supper are broken and drunk as a shared experience (Matthew 26:26; 1 Cor. 10:16). The broken bread points us to the humanity of Jesus. The Son of Glory took upon Himself the form of a servant. The Almighty hovered Himself by becoming a man. The bread, being the most basic and lowly of all foods, points to the humanity and availability of our Lord. By taking on our humanity Jesus Christ because accessible to us all, just is the most readily available food for everyone, both rich and poor.
The Breaking of Bread also reminds us of the cross upon which our Lord’s body was broken. Bread is made from crushed wheat and wine is made from the pressed grape; both elements represent suffering and death. Yet, the Breaking of Bread does not only depict the suffering and death of Christ. It also shows forth His resurrection. The grain of wheat has gone into the ground, but it now lives to produce many grains like unto itself (John 12:24). While we eat the representation of His flesh and drink the representation of His blood through the Supper, we obtain His life (John 6:53). This is the principle of resurrection—Life coming out of death.
The revelation of the resurrected Christ is also bound up with the broken bread. When the risen Lord ate with His disciples it was bread that He broke with them (John 21:13). In like manner the resurrected Christ appeared to people on the Emmaus road but their eyes were not opened to recognize Him until He broke the bread (Luke 24:30-32). The Lord’s Supper reveals Christ to us.
The testimony of the oneness of Christ’s Body is also embodied in the Breaking of Bread. Recall that there was only one loaf that the early Christians broke. Paul writes, “Because there is one loaf, we, who are many are one body, for all partake of the one loaf” (1 Cor. 10:17). “There is one Body” …such company thus owns no other membership than that of the one Church, the Body of Christ, to which Christians belong by the operation of the Holy Spirit (Ephesians 1:22-23; 1 Cor. 12:12-13). It is the Lord’s Supper that is the symbol of this unity and the Scriptural observance of this memorial feast is really the expression of Christian unity (John Reid, 1987).
Thus the Lord’s people gather together and bear witness of their oneness of life in Christ and in the Body of which He is the Head. It is in this way that every evidenced believer is welcome to enjoy Christian privilege and fellowship according to Scriptural simplicity and order. When Jesus celebrated the Passover, which was the first Lord’s Supper, He offered the wine cup to His disciples with the word, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood” (Luke 22:20). By this action, the Lord was pointing out this one fact; the Supper was a covenant meal wherein His disciples revisited the common memories they shared and celebrated their new identity in the Messiah.
Today when we celebrate the Lord’s Supper as a meal we are remembering the covenant we have with God in Christ. We are participating in the shared memory of what Jesus has done for us and we are proclaiming our new identity in Him. Water baptism is the Scriptural mode of our initiation into the Christian faith and the Lord’s Supper is a reaffirmation of our initial commitment to Christ. Through it, we reaffirm our faith in Jesus and our identity in Him as part of the new creation. It possesses past, present, and future implications. It is a re-proclamation of the Lord’s sacrificial death for us in the past. It’s a re-declaration of His ever-abiding nearness with us in the present, and it’s a re-pronouncement of the Hope of glory—His coming in the future.
In other words, the Lord’s Supper is a living testimony to the three chief virtues—faith, hope and love. Through the Supper we re-ground ourselves in that glorious salvation that is ours by faith. We express our love for the brethren as we reflect on the one Body, and we rejoice in the hope of our Lord’s soon return. By observing the Supper, we “proclaim (present) the Lord’s death (past) until He returns (future)” (1 Cor. 11:26). Through the Supper, the Holy Spirit reveals the living Christ to our hearts anew and afresh. By it, we reaffirm our faith in Jesus and membership in His Body. Through the Supper we sup with Christ and His people. For these reasons the early Christians made it an important part of their gatherings. Suffice it to say that the Lord Himself instituted the Supper (Matthew 26:26), and His apostles handed it down to us (1 Cor. 11:2). It is a spiritual reality.
For the first followers, the Lord’s Supper was not an end in itself, but means of communing with the triune God. The ties that bind are relationships, nor rules. The “light of the world” is not the message of Jesus. Jesus Himself is the light of the world. In the observance of the Lord’s Supper, the redeemed of the Lord, as His local Body, corporately express Christ. For He is the Message on earth.
Our faith is not a commitment to a course, it is the acceptance of an invitation to join Jesus on His journey and to live life in the mystery of God made flesh. To the believer the contact is the content. When we celebrate the Lord’s Supper, we are indeed celebrating the life of Jesus who is the Good News.
T Cyprian Kia
Verse of the Day
Saturday, February 2, 2013
Saturday, January 19, 2013
The Ekklesia
The Greek word for church is ekklesia, and it literally means ‘assembly’. This meshes with the dominant thought in Paul’s letters that the church is Christ in corporate expression (I Cor. 12:1-27; Eph. 1:22-23; 4:1-16). Surprisingly the Bible never defines the church. Instead it presents it through a number of different metaphors.
One of the reasons why the New Testament gives us numerous metaphors to depict the church is because the church is too comprehensive and rich to be captured by a single definition or metaphor. Unfortunately, our tendency is to latch on to one particular metaphor and understand the ekklesia through it alone.
By latching on to just one metaphor—whether it be the body, the army, the temple, the bride, the vineyard or the city—we lose the message that other metaphors convey. The result is that our view of the church will become limited at best or lopsided at worst. Although the New Testament writers depict the church with a variety of different images, their favorite image is that of the family. Familiar terms like ‘new birth,’ ‘children of God,’ ‘sons of God,’ ‘brethren,’ ‘fathers,’ ‘brothers,’ ’sisters,’ and ’household’ saturate the New Testament writing.
For this reason Paul would say: ‘Therefore, as we have opportunity, let us do good to all people, especially to those who belong to the family of believers’ ( Gal. 6:10; Rom. 8:29; Eph. 2:19; I Tim. 5:12; 3:15). To this Peter urged: ‘Like newborn babies crave pure spiritual milk, so that by it you may grow up in your salvation’ (I Pet. 2:2). John added to this by saying: ‘I write to you dear children because your sins have been forgiven on account of His name. I write to you fathers, because you have known Him who is from the beginning. I write to you young men, because you have overcome the evil one. I write to you dear children, because you have known the Father’ (I John 2:12-13). These writings of Paul, Peter, and John in particular are punctuated with the language and imagery of family.
These images simply teach us that the church is a living organism rather that an institution. The church we read about in the New Testament was ‘organic’. By that it means it was born from and sustained by spiritual life instead of constructed by human institutions, controlled by human hierarchy, shaped by lifeless rituals and held together by religious programs. An organic church is one that is naturally produced when a group of people have encountered Jesus Christ in reality (external ecclesiastical programs being unnecessary). It is not a theater with scripts; it is a gathered community that lives by divine life. It does not operate on the same organizational principles that run the business corporate world.
Besides, in all of Paul’s letters to the churches he speaks to the ‘brethren’—a term that includes both brothers and sisters in Christ. He uses this familial term more than 130 times in his epistles; so without question the New Testament is filled with the language and images of family. When we stop giving glib assent to the idea that the church is a family and start fleshing out its sober implications, the following characteristics would emerge.
The church as family would take care of their own. Its members would take care of one another, as a true family takes care of its own. A dysfunctional family does not. Members of a dysfunctional family are selfish, individualistic, and profoundly independent. This family is characterized by detachment, and non-connectedness. Nor do they seem to care much for each other (James 2:14-17. Real faith expresses itself in acts of love toward our brothers and sisters in Christ (Eph. 4:28; Rom. 12:5, 13; 2 Cor. 8:12-15; Gal: 6:2; John 15:12-13).
The church, as family, takes time to know one another outside of scheduled meetings. Hence, the Scripture says: ‘They devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and the fellowship, to the breaking of bread in their homes and all together with glad and sincere hearts (Acts 2: 42, 46). This is a functioning family model.
On the other hand when the church family is in a dysfunctional state, members barely know each other and; consequently, are unable to show affection to each other. In a functioning church, members show sincere affection one to another. It is in such atmosphere that growth in the membership is experienced. As a family it will grow. Biologically, growth is natural happening in the family.
A church grows in two ways. One way is through hiving (division) and multiplication. That is, if a church grows too large, it may divide and multiply into two fellowships. Our bodies grow the same way: cells divide and then multiply. Another way is by addition. That is by giving birth to spiritual children. This is the principle of reproduction. If the Lord is at work in a church, it will grow. God gives the increase. It may not be immediate; it may take time, but if the church is alive and healthy, it will grow—both internally (spiritually) and externally (numerically). Churches that live as families grow indeed. Some call this body life.
As a collective and corporate expression, the members share responsibility. In the household of God there are spiritual fathers and mothers. These are the older men and women in the faith with maturity and experience. Their role and responsibility before God is to give guidance and provide mentoring to the younger brothers and sisters in the faith.
This does not mean holding an office or title in the church such as elder, or pastor. These mature ones are aware of their spiritual gifts and are exercising them as believer/priests in the church. In a functioning church family they also contribute their wisdom to the church. They are not obstructed by those who consider themselves as oversight, leaders who are therefore, threatened by it. These ministry activities are organic, and they operate by spiritual life (I John 2:13-14). Every member functions in the church meetings.
Members also function outside in the community life. The spiritual fathers and mothers are very active in mentoring the young and provide wisdom during crises. The mothers teach the young women how to be wise and how to function as wives and mothers (Titus 2:3-4).
The men bring excitement and strength to the church, but they need the stability of the older ones to temper them. The spiritual children inject newfound zeal into the believing community, but they need maturing. They need the older ones to feed them, check up on them, change their diapers, and teach them how to walk with the Lord. This is what it takes to mentor others. It is not about setting up a formal classroom instruction format. Neither is it about playing pastorship in the name of eldership or commended workers.
The Godhead lives in everlasting reciprocity with its members. For this reason, the church is called to be a reciprocal community above everything else, or in other words, a family. It is functioning as a family that the church reflects the triune God in their relationship. Within the triune God one discovers mutual love, mutual fellowship, mutual dependence, mutual honor, mutual submission and mutual dwellings
In the Godhead there exists, therefore, an eternal complimentary, and reciprocal interchange of divine love, and divine fellowship. When the church reflects the personhood of the Godhead, we experience interdependence, wholeness instead of fragmentation, participation, connectedness, solidarity instead of individualism, spontaneity, relationship instead of program, servitude instead of dominance, enrichment, and freedom instead of bondage, community and bonding instead of detachment.
This church is true to the nature of God and functions fully to the intent of the New Testament, a living ekklesia. Here titles such as elders, deacons, officers are not about power and dominance but servitude under the people with the sole intent to lift them up and build them to their full potential. This gathering of believers has one pursuit, one obsession, one goal and one grand purpose: to know and love the Lord Jesus Christ. The healthy church is nonsectarian, nonelitist and nonexclusive. It meets on the ground of Christ. It is a church in living color-ekklesia.
In the words of Stanley Grenz: ‘Only in our spirit-produced corporatness do we truly reflect to all creation the grand dynamic that lies at the heart of the triune God. Our fellowship is nothing more than our communion between the Father and the Son mediated by the Holy Spirit.’ The ekklesia is the family of God.
T. Cyprian Kia
One of the reasons why the New Testament gives us numerous metaphors to depict the church is because the church is too comprehensive and rich to be captured by a single definition or metaphor. Unfortunately, our tendency is to latch on to one particular metaphor and understand the ekklesia through it alone.
By latching on to just one metaphor—whether it be the body, the army, the temple, the bride, the vineyard or the city—we lose the message that other metaphors convey. The result is that our view of the church will become limited at best or lopsided at worst. Although the New Testament writers depict the church with a variety of different images, their favorite image is that of the family. Familiar terms like ‘new birth,’ ‘children of God,’ ‘sons of God,’ ‘brethren,’ ‘fathers,’ ‘brothers,’ ’sisters,’ and ’household’ saturate the New Testament writing.
For this reason Paul would say: ‘Therefore, as we have opportunity, let us do good to all people, especially to those who belong to the family of believers’ ( Gal. 6:10; Rom. 8:29; Eph. 2:19; I Tim. 5:12; 3:15). To this Peter urged: ‘Like newborn babies crave pure spiritual milk, so that by it you may grow up in your salvation’ (I Pet. 2:2). John added to this by saying: ‘I write to you dear children because your sins have been forgiven on account of His name. I write to you fathers, because you have known Him who is from the beginning. I write to you young men, because you have overcome the evil one. I write to you dear children, because you have known the Father’ (I John 2:12-13). These writings of Paul, Peter, and John in particular are punctuated with the language and imagery of family.
These images simply teach us that the church is a living organism rather that an institution. The church we read about in the New Testament was ‘organic’. By that it means it was born from and sustained by spiritual life instead of constructed by human institutions, controlled by human hierarchy, shaped by lifeless rituals and held together by religious programs. An organic church is one that is naturally produced when a group of people have encountered Jesus Christ in reality (external ecclesiastical programs being unnecessary). It is not a theater with scripts; it is a gathered community that lives by divine life. It does not operate on the same organizational principles that run the business corporate world.
Besides, in all of Paul’s letters to the churches he speaks to the ‘brethren’—a term that includes both brothers and sisters in Christ. He uses this familial term more than 130 times in his epistles; so without question the New Testament is filled with the language and images of family. When we stop giving glib assent to the idea that the church is a family and start fleshing out its sober implications, the following characteristics would emerge.
The church as family would take care of their own. Its members would take care of one another, as a true family takes care of its own. A dysfunctional family does not. Members of a dysfunctional family are selfish, individualistic, and profoundly independent. This family is characterized by detachment, and non-connectedness. Nor do they seem to care much for each other (James 2:14-17. Real faith expresses itself in acts of love toward our brothers and sisters in Christ (Eph. 4:28; Rom. 12:5, 13; 2 Cor. 8:12-15; Gal: 6:2; John 15:12-13).
The church, as family, takes time to know one another outside of scheduled meetings. Hence, the Scripture says: ‘They devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and the fellowship, to the breaking of bread in their homes and all together with glad and sincere hearts (Acts 2: 42, 46). This is a functioning family model.
On the other hand when the church family is in a dysfunctional state, members barely know each other and; consequently, are unable to show affection to each other. In a functioning church, members show sincere affection one to another. It is in such atmosphere that growth in the membership is experienced. As a family it will grow. Biologically, growth is natural happening in the family.
A church grows in two ways. One way is through hiving (division) and multiplication. That is, if a church grows too large, it may divide and multiply into two fellowships. Our bodies grow the same way: cells divide and then multiply. Another way is by addition. That is by giving birth to spiritual children. This is the principle of reproduction. If the Lord is at work in a church, it will grow. God gives the increase. It may not be immediate; it may take time, but if the church is alive and healthy, it will grow—both internally (spiritually) and externally (numerically). Churches that live as families grow indeed. Some call this body life.
As a collective and corporate expression, the members share responsibility. In the household of God there are spiritual fathers and mothers. These are the older men and women in the faith with maturity and experience. Their role and responsibility before God is to give guidance and provide mentoring to the younger brothers and sisters in the faith.
This does not mean holding an office or title in the church such as elder, or pastor. These mature ones are aware of their spiritual gifts and are exercising them as believer/priests in the church. In a functioning church family they also contribute their wisdom to the church. They are not obstructed by those who consider themselves as oversight, leaders who are therefore, threatened by it. These ministry activities are organic, and they operate by spiritual life (I John 2:13-14). Every member functions in the church meetings.
Members also function outside in the community life. The spiritual fathers and mothers are very active in mentoring the young and provide wisdom during crises. The mothers teach the young women how to be wise and how to function as wives and mothers (Titus 2:3-4).
The men bring excitement and strength to the church, but they need the stability of the older ones to temper them. The spiritual children inject newfound zeal into the believing community, but they need maturing. They need the older ones to feed them, check up on them, change their diapers, and teach them how to walk with the Lord. This is what it takes to mentor others. It is not about setting up a formal classroom instruction format. Neither is it about playing pastorship in the name of eldership or commended workers.
The Godhead lives in everlasting reciprocity with its members. For this reason, the church is called to be a reciprocal community above everything else, or in other words, a family. It is functioning as a family that the church reflects the triune God in their relationship. Within the triune God one discovers mutual love, mutual fellowship, mutual dependence, mutual honor, mutual submission and mutual dwellings
In the Godhead there exists, therefore, an eternal complimentary, and reciprocal interchange of divine love, and divine fellowship. When the church reflects the personhood of the Godhead, we experience interdependence, wholeness instead of fragmentation, participation, connectedness, solidarity instead of individualism, spontaneity, relationship instead of program, servitude instead of dominance, enrichment, and freedom instead of bondage, community and bonding instead of detachment.
This church is true to the nature of God and functions fully to the intent of the New Testament, a living ekklesia. Here titles such as elders, deacons, officers are not about power and dominance but servitude under the people with the sole intent to lift them up and build them to their full potential. This gathering of believers has one pursuit, one obsession, one goal and one grand purpose: to know and love the Lord Jesus Christ. The healthy church is nonsectarian, nonelitist and nonexclusive. It meets on the ground of Christ. It is a church in living color-ekklesia.
In the words of Stanley Grenz: ‘Only in our spirit-produced corporatness do we truly reflect to all creation the grand dynamic that lies at the heart of the triune God. Our fellowship is nothing more than our communion between the Father and the Son mediated by the Holy Spirit.’ The ekklesia is the family of God.
T. Cyprian Kia
Saturday, January 5, 2013
Spiritual Gifts are Divine Investments in You: Be Accountable
There are many things wrong with
the church today just as there have been many things wrong with it throughout
the centuries since Jesus came to establish it.
In some places the churches are not true to the teaching of the Scriptures.
They have imposed their own views of God’s program, will, and nature on the
Bible. They pick and choose the part they want to believe and cast aside the
others.
In other places, the churches have
lost their vision for mission and evangelism. All their energies are expended in caring for
their own members. Their horizon reaches
only to the back pews of their own buildings. They behave as though Jesus had
died only for them, or as though men and women are going to heaven regard less
of what they believe.
The others things visibly hurting
the church are divisions that stem from racial bigotry, heresies that grow out
of Biblical ignorance, personality cults that celebrate human achievement,
compromise with pagan valves in sexual and marital matters. All these give the
church a clinical rating that ranks with some of the sickest persons in an
intensive care ward. These problems
weaken the church’s mission, but what debilitates the church more is the
neglect of spiritual gifts in the body of Christ. The situation in thousands of
assemblies and gatherings is literally tragic. It is sad, despite Christ’s
strong warning. Matthew 25:14-30 speak
specifically to the tragedy that God’s people suffer when they do not make the
most of the gifts that God has given them. The story is in the parable of the
talents whose familiar theme is found in the text;
1)
the tragedy of abused accountability;
2)
the tragedy of missed opportunity; and
3)
the tragedy of lost joy.
No account of the discovery and
cultivation of our spiritual gifts can be complete if we fail to note the
damage done when those gifts are neglected.
The people in the parable are one key to its message: a master and three
servants. That relationship speaks of accountability. Servants must answer to
their master in all details of their life and work. We make a great mistake when
we mix our role with God’s; He sets the term of our work. He is in all things
the Master, our task is not to make the rules, but to obey by saying “yes” to
the rules He has already made.
Jesus began His parable thus: “For
it will be as when a man going on a journey called his servants and entrusted
to them his property to one he gave five talents, to another two to another
one, to each according to his ability. Then he went away. “(Matt. 25:14-15). Who decides who would get the five, the two
and the one? The master, of course, only he knew that servants well enough to
determine how much property each of them had ability to handle. There was no
squabble among them, no elbowing each other for the largest share, no
badgering the master for an extra talent. They recognized his right to decide.
They had no property of their own, nor any power to acquire it. Their share was
determined by His grace and by that grace alone. We are accountable to the Master’s
grace.
The master’s grace placed them
under obligation to make the best possible response. What they had not earned
or deserved had been put in their trust, their only acceptable answer was to
use it well. The Master of the Church gives these gifts of the Spirit to the Body
as expressions of His grace. We do not chose which gifts we receive or how
many. These matters are up to Him. Most importantly, we cannot chose not to use
what He has given us.
There is a purpose why He lavished
His grace upon us. This fact is made clear in the master’s rebuke of the
servants who had hid his own talent (matt 25:276-27). It tells us that God’s
grace in our lives is counted as an investment. It is not just to be conserved.
That was the wretched servant’s mistake. He did not realize that grace is a
seed to be planted for further growth. He did not understand that God’s
blessings are not for hoarding, but for multiplying as we put them to work in
the lives of others.
That servant could not plead
ignorance. He knew precisely how demanding the master was. But he misapplied
the knowledge that he had. He was defensive, not aggressive. He took no risks
in using the master’s grace and, in so doing, took the greatest risk of all; he
neglected his accountability to the master’s purpose.
The gifts of God’s, Holy Spirit
are precious and true. And the Lord of the Church demandingly wants them
treated as such. They are not like gold to be stored in Fort Knox, nor like
Rembrandts’ paintings to be hung in a well-guarded museum. They are fuel to be
converted into spiritual power, they are ore to be refined into useful tools,
and they are seedlings which will grow into fruitful trees.
The grace of God granted this
servant was an opportunity to expand and grow as a person; he missed all that
because he was fearful and unduly cautious. God gives more, when we use well what
we have. Part of the servant’s tragedy
was that he missed his opportunity for greater blessings. The Master’s command
was harsh; “Take the talent” he said “from him, and give it him who has will
more be given, and he will have abundance, but from him who has not, even what
he has will be taken away” (Matt 25:28-29).
The greatest responsibilities, the
larger privilege, the expanded service, the enhanced growth, all of these
chances were missed because the servant misread his master’s instructions. Sadly
he lost the chance he had; so his single talent had to be forfeited. Unused gifts may lead to disqualification
from God’s service. Who dare take lightly any spiritual gift bestowed upon us
by the risen Lord Jesus. He is Lord of
all. Wisdom demands that we discover what gifts God has given us and to diligently
use them in full submission to Him. It is not about doing things for God or
being active, busy and involved. Rather
it is about letting God do things through us. Let us not cripple the Church and
turn the body of Christ into losers because the Holy Spirit gifts have not been
put to work for God’s purpose. Joy follows when we purposefully use our
spiritual gifts in service for Him. Let us therefore, walk humbly before our
God and be accountable to Him for the spiritual gifts we have received so far.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)